JAK inhibitors in the treatment of adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective monocentric experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in a monocentric cohort of adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Patients attending a rheumatology transition clinic were retrospectively included in case of: i) JIA diagnosis according to current classification criteria (1); ii) age ≥18 years and iii) treatment with JAKi for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Seventeen adult patients with JIA were treated with JAKi (as first JAKi, 9 patients (52.9%) received tofacitinib and 8 (47.1%) baricitinib). At 3 months after JAKi initiation, 8 patients (47%) achieved a response and 4 patients (23.5%) achieved disease remission (3 patients with baricitinib and 1 with tofacitinib, 37.5% vs. 16.7%, p=0.294). None of those with systemic JIA and enthesitis-related arthritis obtained remission; the remission rate at 3 months was higher, although not significantly, in the oligoarticular subset compared to the polyarticular subset (37.5% vs. 20%). Patients with ≤1 active joint involvement at JAKi start had a higher remission rate (50% vs. 22.2%). Subjects who achieved remission on JAKi had a significantly lower pre-treatment DAS28-CRP compared to those with still active disease (p=0.010, Mann-Whitney U=4). A pre-treatment DAS28-CRP <3.76 predicted response to JAKi with 100% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity (p=0.023). The remission rate was lower among patients who had been treated with ≥2 biological drugs before JAKi start (9% vs. 66.7%; p=0.05). One patient in concomitant treatment with leflunomide developed severe arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: JAKi may represent an effective and safe treatment option for adult JIA patients with low/moderate disease activity, particularly in case of oligoarticular involvement.

Weaving EU digital health policy into national healthcare practices. The making of a reimbursement standard for digital health technologies in Belgium.

Along the hopes and fears around the recent rise of Digital Health Technologies (DHT), EU and Member State (MS) policymakers have sought to find ways to translate these innovations into tangible trustworthy and reliable tools for health and care practices. While these translation-efforts have been developed across different healthcare contexts with their own histories, practices, and values, their increasing entanglement has over the years raised several implementation issues between EU and MS policy initiatives. While policymakers have struggled to understand the reasons behind this, this article proposes to 'move focus' towards a socio-technical understanding of DHT by investigating how these alignment attempts come about in practice. For this we focus on Belgium's frontrunning attempt to develop a reimbursement framework for DHT. Drawing on a document analysis of EU and Belgian policy, media, and industry publications (2016-2022), field observations, and interviews, we demonstrate how Belgian policymakers have tried to align their attempt to improve trust in DHT with existing EU efforts in this regard through the development of their 'mhealthBelgium validation pyramid'. With this, we show that rather than overcoming translation difficulties, the pyramid is in fact enacting frictions around 'trust', 'medical' devices, the 'empowered' patient, and 'valuable' data. Beyond mere technical accounts of the translation challenges at hand, this article therefore points to the way this pyramid is "locking-in" these frictions, and with this has hindered the implementation of DHT. Despite the Belgian government's announcement of a renewed reimbursement framework two years later, its emphasis on overcoming technical translation issues risks re-enacting these very same entrenched frictions.

Predictors of lack of response to methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical features associated with lack of response to MTX in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis (JIA-U). METHODS: Clinical records of JIA-U patients were retrospectively reviewed. Differences among variables were assessed by Mann-Whitney and χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. Association between predictors and requirement of a biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) was evaluated by univariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. A multivariable logistic model was applied to estimate strength of association, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Data from 99 JIA-U patients treated with MTX were analysed (82.8% female), with a mean follow up of 9.2 years and a mean age at uveitis onset of 5.7 years. In 65 patients (65.7%) at least one bDMARD to control uveitis was required. Children requiring a bDMARD for uveitis had lower age at JIA and uveitis onset, more frequent polyarticular course, higher frequency of bilateral uveitis at onset and higher prevalence of systemic steroids' use. Despite similar frequency of ocular damage at onset, MTX non responders showed a higher percentage of ocular damage at last visit. Younger age at JIA onset, polyarticular course and a history of systemic steroids' use resulted independent factors associated to lack of response to MTX at Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariate model confirms the independent role of both polyarticular course and systemic steroids' use. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age at JIA onset, polyarticular course and a history of systemic steroids' use are predictors of a worse response to MTX in JIA-U.

Performing publics of science in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal.

Research about science and publics in the COVID-19 pandemic often focuses on public trust and on identifying and correcting public attitudes. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 209 residents in six countries-Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal-this article uses the concept of performativity to explore how participants understand, and relate to science, in the COVID-19 context. By performativity, we mean the ways by which participants understand themselves as particular sorts of publics through identification with, and differentiation from, various other actors in matters that are perceived as controversies surrounding science: COVID-19 vaccination, media communication of science, and the interactions between governments and scientists. The criteria used to construct the similarities and differences among publics were heterogeneous and fluid, showing how epistemic beliefs about the nature of, and trust in, scientific knowledge are intermingled with social and cultural memberships embedded in specific contexts and across disparate places.

The European health data space: Too big to succeed?

In May 2022, the European Commission issued the Proposal for a Regulation on the European Health Data Space (EHDS), with the aims of granting citizens increased access to and control of their (electronic) health data across the EU, and facilitating health data re-use for research, innovation, and policymaking. As the first in a series of European domain-specific "data spaces", the EHDS is a high-stakes development that will transform health data governance in the EU region. As an international consortium of experts from health policy, law, ethics and the social sciences, we are concerned that the EHDS Proposal will detract from, rather than lead to the achievement of, its stated aims. We are in no doubt on the benefits of using health data for secondary purposes, and we appreciate attempts to facilitate such uses across borders in a carefully curated manner. Based on the current draft Regulation, however, the EHDS risks undermining rather than enhancing patient control over data; hindering rather than facilitating the work of health professionals and researchers; and eroding rather than increasing the public value generated through health data sharing. Therefore, significant adjustments are needed if the EHDS is to realize its promised benefits. Besides analyzing the implications for key groups and European societies at large who will be affected by the implementation of the EHDS, this contribution advances targeted policy recommendations to address the identified shortcomings of the EHDS Proposal.

Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe.

Calls for solidarity have been an ubiquitous feature in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we know little about how people have thought of and practised solidarity in their everyday lives since the beginning of the pandemic. What role does solidarity play in people's lives, how does it relate to COVID-19 public health measures and how has it changed in different phases of the pandemic? Situated within the medical humanities at the intersection of philosophy, bioethics, social sciences and policy studies, this article explores how the practice-based understanding of solidarity formulated by Prainsack and Buyx helps shed light on these questions. Drawing on 643 qualitative interviews carried out in two phases (April-May 2020 and October 2020) in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK), the data show that interpersonal acts of solidarity are important, but that they are not sustainable without consistent support at the institutional level. As the pandemic progressed, respondents expressed a longing for more institutionalised forms of solidarity. We argue that the medical humanities have much to gain from directing their attention to individual health issues, and to collective experiences of health or illness. The analysis of experiences through a collective lens such as solidarity offers unique insights to understandings of the individual and the collective. We propose three essential advances for research in the medical humanities that can help uncover collective experiences of disease and health crises: (1) an empirical and practice-oriented approach alongside more normative approaches; (2) the confidence to make recommendations for practice and policymaking and (3) the pursuit of cross-national and multidisciplinary research collaborations.

Case report: Prader-Willi syndrome and inflammatory arthritis-An important consideration.

Background: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a multisystemic genetically determined disorder. Musculoskeletal manifestations are common in most patients. We report the cases of two children with PWS who developed inflammatory arthritis, complicated with chronic anterior bilateral uveitis in one case. To our knowledge, no previous reports of such an association exist. Case presentation: Case 1 was of a 3-year-old girl diagnosed with PWS who developed arthritis of the right knee with morning stiffness, joint swelling, and limited range of motion. Other causes of arthritis were ruled out. Increased inflammatory markers, antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity, and hypertrophic synovitis on ultrasound confirmed the diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis compatible with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Despite the treatment with methotrexate, arthritis progressed, and etanercept was added. The patient reached and maintained articular remission while on combined MTX and etanercept treatment during 9 years of follow-up. Case 2 was of a 6-year-old boy diagnosed with PWS who developed arthritis of the right knee. Laboratory investigations showed mildly increased acute phase reactants, microcytic anemia, and ANA positivity at high titer (titer 1:1,280). Infectious and other causes of arthritis were excluded. Ultrasound confirmed the presence of joint effusion and synovial thickening, and synovial fluid analysis was consistent with inflammatory arthrosynovitis (white blood cell count of 14,200/µl) compatible with JIA. Shortly after the diagnosis, the ophthalmologic evaluation revealed the presence of bilateral anterior uveitis. Despite MTX and topical corticosteroid, ocular inflammation persisted and adalimumab was added. At the last follow-up, 9 months later, the child experienced inactivity of arthritis and uveitis with normal growth. Conclusions: We aim to raise awareness of this possible association among pediatricians since arthritis might be underestimated due to high pain tolerance, behavioral disturbances, and other musculoskeletal abnormalities in PWS patients.

Fast-tracking development and regulatory approval of COVID-19 vaccines in the EU: A review of ethical implications.

The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 worldwide has triggered intense activity in the field of biotechnology, leading to the development and regulatory approval of multiple COVID-19 vaccines in less than 1 year while raising sustained scrutiny as to the ethical issues associated with this process. This article pursues a twofold objective. First, it reconstructs and provides a thorough overview of the different steps, from clinical trial design to regulatory procedures, underpinning the "fast-tracking" of COVID-19 vaccine R&D and approval. Second, drawing on a review of published literature, the article identifies, outlines, and analyzes the most ethically challenging aspects related to such process, including concerns around vaccine safety, issues in study design, the enrollment of study participants, and the challenges in obtaining valid informed consent. By scrutinizing relevant aspects of COVID-19 vaccine development and regulatory processes leading to market authorization, this article ultimately aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the regulatory and ethical issues underpinning the roll-out of this key pandemic-containment technology worldwide.

Tocilizumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis, a Narrative Review.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated uveitis (JIA-U) is the most common extra-articular manifestation of JIA, affecting 10-15% of patients, especially in oligoarticular JIA where its course may be faint. Therefore, JIA-U is one of the most challenging pediatric uveitis, associated with major ocular morbidity and possibly leading to irreversible structural ocular damage and to vision-threatening complications. Adequate management is crucial for avoiding visual impairment complications. Since the introduction of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDS), the visual prognosis of JIA-U has dramatically improved over the decades. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blockers are the most used bDMARDs in treating JIA-U with large evidence of efficacy. However, inadequate response to these agents, either due to intolerance or inefficacy, may be observed, requiring a swap to other classes of immunosuppressive agents, including anti-IL-6, anti-CD20, and, more recently, JAK inhibitors. Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to the interelukin-6 receptor preventing IL-6 from binding to its soluble and membrane-bound receptors. A growing body of literature provides promising results about the efficacy of intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of JIA-U. A narrative review of the literature on this topic will improve our knowledge on the potential use of tocilizumab in JIA-U.

The social and socio-political embeddedness of COVID-19 vaccination decision-making: A five-country qualitative interview study from Europe.

The uptake ofCOVID-19 vaccines has varied considerably across European countries. This study investigates people's decision-making process regarding vaccination by analyzing qualitative interviews (n = 214) with residents from five European countries: Austria, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Switzerland. We identify three factors that shape vaccination decision-making: individual experiences and pre-existing attitudes towards vaccination, social environment, and socio-political context. Based on this analysis, we present a typology of decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccines, where some types present stable stances towards vaccines and others change over time. Trust in government and relevant stakeholders, broader social factors, and people's direct social environment were particularly relevant to these dynamics. We conclude that vaccination campaigns should be considered long-term projects (also outside of pandemics) in need of regular adjustment, communication and fine-tuning to ensure public trust. This is particularly pertinent for booster vaccinations, such as COVID-19 or influenza.

Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis.

AIM: To describe the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC-TCZ) in a cohort of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients with refractory uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective observational monocentric study including patients with JIA-associated uveitis treated with SC-TCZ. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled. The rate of uveitis flare/year per each patient was 1.6 ± 2.0 on the last bDMARDs before SC-TCZ, while it decreased to 0.4 ± 0.7 on SC-TCZ. Nine out of thirteen patients (69%) required the introduction of SC-TCZ only for active uveitis at baseline. Among these patients, five (56%) achieved complete treatment response. No uveitis relapses were observed in patients (4/13, 31%) requiring the introduction of SC-TCZ for active arthritis during follow-up (30.48 ± 21.6 months). Overall, SC-TCZ was safe, and no side effects were observed during the treatment. CONCLUSION: SC-TCZ can be effective and safe in patients with JIA and uveitis recalcitrant to several bDMARDs.

Democratic research: Setting up a research commons for a qualitative, comparative, longitudinal interview study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The sudden and dramatic advent of the COVID-19 pandemic led to urgent demands for timely, relevant, yet rigorous research. This paper discusses the origin, design, and execution of the SolPan research commons, a large-scale, international, comparative, qualitative research project that sought to respond to the need for knowledge among researchers and policymakers in times of crisis. The form of organization as a research commons is characterized by an underlying solidaristic attitude of its members and its intrinsic organizational features in which research data and knowledge in the study is shared and jointly owned. As such, the project is peer-governed, rooted in (idealist) social values of academia, and aims at providing tools and benefits for its members. In this paper, we discuss challenges and solutions for qualitative studies that seek to operate as research commons.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Uveitis and Multiple Sclerosis: Description of Two Patients and Literature Review.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood, while multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, characterized by remission and exacerbation phases. An association between MS and rheumatologic diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis, has been described and numerous studies acknowledge anti-TNF-α drugs as MS triggers. Conversely, the association between MS and JIA has been reported merely in five cases in the literature. We describe two cases of adult patients with longstanding JIA and JIA-associated uveitis, who developed MS. The first patient was on methotrexate and adalimumab when she developed dizziness and nausea. Characteristic MRI lesions and oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid led to MS diagnosis. Adalimumab was discontinued, and she was treated with three pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone. After a few months, rituximab was started. The second patient had been treated with anti-TNF-α and then switched to abatacept. She complained of unilateral arm and facial paraesthesias; brain MRI showed characteristic lesions, and MS was diagnosed. Three pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone were administered; neurological disease remained stable, and abatacept was reintroduced. Further studies are warranted to define if there is an association between JIA and MS, if MS represents JIA comorbidity or if anti-TNF-α underpins MS development.

Anticipating hopes, fears and expectations towards COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative interview study in seven European countries.

Vaccine uptake is essential to managing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern. At the same time, both decision-makers and the general population have high hopes for COVID-19 vaccination. Drawing from qualitative interview data collected in October 2020 as part of the pan-European SolPan study, this study explores early and anticipatory expectations, hopes and fears regarding COVID-19 vaccination across seven European countries. We find that stances towards COVID-19 vaccines were shaped by personal lived experiences, but participants also aligned personal and communal interests in their considerations. Trust, particularly in expert institutions, was an important prerequisite for vaccine acceptance, but participants also expressed doubts about the rapid vaccine development process. Our findings emphasise the need to move beyond the study of factors driving vaccine hesitancy, and instead to focus on how people personally perceive vaccination in their particular social and political context.

Development and Implementation of the AIDA International Registry for Patients with Non-Infectious Uveitis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper is to point out the design, development and deployment of the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) International Registry for paediatric and adult patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: This is a physician-driven, population- and electronic-based registry implemented for both retrospective and prospective collection of real-world demographics, clinical, laboratory, instrumental and socioeconomic data of patients with uveitis and other non-infectious inflammatory ocular diseases recruited through the AIDA Network. Data recruitment, based on the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool, is thought to collect standardised information for real-life research and has been developed to change over time according to future scientific acquisitions and potentially communicate with other similar instruments. Security, data quality and data governance are cornerstones of this platform. RESULTS: Ninety-five centres have been involved from 19 countries and four continents from 24 March to 16 November 2021. Forty-eight out of 95 have already obtained the approval from their local ethics committees. At present, the platform counts 259 users (95 principal investigators, 160 site investigators, 2 lead investigators, and 2 data managers). The AIDA Registry collects baseline and follow-up data using 3943 fields organised into 13 instruments, including patient's demographics, history, symptoms, trigger/risk factors, therapies and healthcare utilization for patients with NIU. CONCLUSIONS: The development of the AIDA Registry for patients with NIU will facilitate the collection of standardised data leading to real-world evidence and enabling international multicentre collaborative research through inclusion of patients and their families worldwide.

Normative positions towards COVID-19 contact-tracing apps: findings from a large-scale qualitative study in nine European countries.

Mobile applications for digital contact tracing have been developed and introduced around the world in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Proposed as a tool to support 'traditional' forms of contact-tracing carried out to monitor contagion, these apps have triggered an intense debate with respect to their legal and ethical permissibility, social desirability and general feasibility. Based on a large-scale study including qualitative data from 349 interviews conducted in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland, the United Kingdom), this paper shows that the binary framing often found in surveys and polls, which contrasts privacy concerns with the usefulness of these interventions for public health, does not capture the depth, breadth, and nuances of people's positions towards COVID-19 contact-tracing apps. The paper provides a detailed account of how people arrive at certain normative positions by analysing the argumentative patterns, tropes and (moral) repertoires underpinning people's perspectives on digital contact-tracing. Specifically, we identified a spectrum comprising five normative positions towards the use of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps: opposition, scepticism of feasibility, pondered deliberation, resignation, and support. We describe these stances and analyse the diversity of assumptions and values that underlie the normative orientations of our interviewees. We conclude by arguing that policy attempts to develop and implement these and other digital responses to the pandemic should move beyond the reiteration of binary framings, and instead cater to the variety of values, concerns and expectations that citizens voice in discussions about these types of public health interventions.

Single cell-derived spheroids capture the self-renewing subpopulations of metastatic ovarian cancer.

High Grade Serous Ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is a major unmet need in oncology, due to its precocious dissemination and the lack of meaningful human models for the investigation of disease pathogenesis in a patient-specific manner. To overcome this roadblock, we present a new method to isolate and grow single cells directly from patients' metastatic ascites, establishing the conditions for propagating them as 3D cultures that we refer to as single cell-derived metastatic ovarian cancer spheroids (sMOCS). By single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) we define the cellular composition of metastatic ascites and trace its propagation in 2D and 3D culture paradigms, finding that sMOCS retain and amplify key subpopulations from the original patients' samples and recapitulate features of the original metastasis that do not emerge from classical 2D culture, including retention of individual patients' specificities. By enabling the enrichment of uniquely informative cell subpopulations from HGSOC metastasis and the clonal interrogation of their diversity at the functional and molecular level, this method provides a powerful instrument for precision oncology in ovarian cancer.

The FDA's standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation.

As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a 'panacea' for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been a frontrunner in adapting its regulatory framework to DHT. However, despite the utmost relevance of quality and safety standards and their role for sustaining the innovation pathway of DHT, their actual making has not yet been subjected to in-depth social-science scrutiny. Drawing on the conceptual repertoires of Science and Technology Studies (STS), this article investigates how digital health evolved from a buzzword into an 'object of government', or gained material meaning and transformed into a regulatable object, by charting the standard-making process of FDA's medical digital health policy between 2008 and 2018. From this, we reflect on the mutually sustaining dynamics between technological and organizational innovation, as the FDA's attempts to standardize medical DHT not only shaped the lifestyle/medical boundary for DHT. It also led to significant reconfigurations within the FDA itself, while fostering a broader shift toward the uptake of alternative forms of evidence in regulatory science.